Microsoft's upcoming Windows XP operating system will cause "significant harm" to consumers, said four consumer advocacy groups in a report released Wednesday.
Windows XP's tight integration with other software and restrictive licensing terms "not only mimic Microsoft's previous violations of antitrust laws, but also significantly add to them," the groups said in a prepared statement. The organizations' report -- "Windows XP/.Net: Microsoft's Expanding Monopoly" -- was written by Mark Cooper of the Consumer Federation of America and Christopher Murray of the Consumers Union. Media Access Project and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group also signed the analysis.
The organizations also sent a letter to several federal and state officials connected with the U.S. government's antitrust case against Microsoft, urging them to enact suitably severe measures to curb Microsoft's behavior and to appoint a special master to aggressively enforce the chosen remedies.
"Without severe penalties for failing to comply with the consent decree, Microsoft -- as evidenced by past behavior -- has no incentive to obey the law. Financial penalties for noncompliance should be sufficiently large as to be meaningful to a company with billions of dollars of cash on hand garnered through abuse of monopoly power," the groups wrote. "Break-up should be a continual threat available to the Court should it determine that Microsoft fails to comply with the conduct remedy."
Microsoft representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the groups' report, but said a response is forthcoming.
Microsoft's Windows XP/.Net bundle contains commingled code, proprietary programming languages, restrictive licensing terms and obstacles to thwart users from taking advantage of competitors' products, according to the report. It also charges that Microsoft uses its software and services to deliver "misleading messages," suggesting that products other than its own might not provide adequate functionality and security.
Microsoft's Passport service of linked Web sites also poses risks to consumers, the authors said, noting the depth of data it allows Microsoft to gather -- data that includes credit card numbers, transaction and Internet usage data and personal information such as nicknames, address books, calendars and Web site bookmarks.
Microsoft's announcement last week that it will make Passport interoperable with rival authentication systemsis "too little, too late" and "looks very similar to Microsoft's long-held strategy, applied to Java and other products, of first embracing them as open, then extending them with proprietary Microsoft elements, and ultimately extinguishing them," the organizations said.
Microsoft may soon have to make good on its interoperability pledge. Sun Microsystems Inc. and an array of industry heavyweights said Wednesday they are developing their own single sign-on authentication system, code-named Liberty Alliance Project, to challenge Passport's dominance.
The Liberty Alliance validates the Passport model, which "gives the industry the choice and control they need," Microsoft spokesman Chris Payne said Wednesday. "If they're sincere, they'll probably want to work with us."
The four consumer groups aren't the only parties agitating for harsh sanctions against Microsoft in light of its upcoming Windows XP release. The state attorneys general for New York and California, who are plaintiffs in the U.S. government's ongoing antitrust suit against Microsoft, said earlier this month that they will push to ensure that remedies imposed on the company are "forward looking" with regard to Windows XP and "will change the conduct by Microsoft that the courts have found to be illegal".
"Windows XP/.Net: Microsoft's Expanding Monopoly" is available online at http://www.consumerfed.org/WINXP_anticompetitive_study.pdf/.