Trial is Hewlett's last chance to stop merger

Walter Hewlett will open the final round of his battle to stop Hewlett Packard's merger with Compaq Computer when the trial against the merger opens this week in Delaware Chancery Court in Wilmington.

          Walter Hewlett will open the final round of his battle to stop Hewlett Packard’s merger with Compaq Computer when the trial against the merger opens this week in Delaware Chancery Court in Wilmington.

          The legal action is also his last best hope.

          Hewlett was dealt a loss last week when the preliminary results of the March 19 proxy election showed that HP had won shareholder support for the merger by 45 million votes out of the 1.6 billion cast.

          That tally, if finalised, would mean the merger would go through, leaving Hewlett with only the trial to stop the corporate marriage that he thinks would be disastrous for the company his father co-founded and that HP management says is needed for the company to move forward and stay strong.

          The only way that Hewlett can still stop the merger is to win in court , but many have begun to say they hope the matter is settled. Even the judge in the case, William B Chandler III, has said Hewlett faces a tough battle to prove his case.

          Hewlett filed suit against the merger in the Delaware court charging, among other things, that HP essentially bought the backing of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank, a charge both HP and the bank deny.

          But as the trial opens, many analysts have suggested that Hewlett’s war against the merger is taking on a Quixotic air.

          “I am sure (Scott) McNealy, among others, is very happy about this because it means two competitors are going to be focused inwardly,” Framingham, Massachusetts- based IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky says.

          Other analysts, even those who have opposed the merger, also wondered if the time has come for Hewlett to let this one go.

          “To drag things through court for a deal that is probably going to go through anyway is probably not in anyone’s best interests,” says Brett Miller an analyst at St Louis-based AG Edwards & Sons.

          Boston-based Summit Strategies analyst Laurie McCabe says that while she was initially against the merger, she now thinks the “soap opera” quality of the battle between HP and Hewlett and the lack of closure is damaging to both Compaq and HP.

          In addition, HP now has both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the US Attorney’s office for the South District of New York looking into the merger. HP CEO and chairwoman Carly Fiorina has said that she welcomes the scrutiny and says the company is looking forward to clearing itself.

          But McCabe says she also wonders if a loss by Hewlett in the three-day trial will actually end things.

          “Things have gotten so drawn out and unpleasant,” McCabe says. “You wonder once the thing does go though will he still be chipping away?”

          At least one HP employee got caught up in that unpleasantness and the fallout from the battle. Last week, Fiorina sent an email to employees saying that one of their own was fired for leaking materials to Hewlett to help him block the merger.

          Hewlett’s lawyers tried to shield other documents and material from internal HP managers and lawyers going into the trial to prevent other firings. However, they were only able to keep those documents from HP’s management, the company’s internal lawyers will be able to see them.

          Those internal HP lawyers are bound from sharing that information with HP management by court rules.

          But there are other long-term implications for the company as a whole, experts say.

          Among them are a reorganisation plan that calls for the layoff of up to 15,000 employees after the merger. Plus, management will have to prove the merger’s worth in a somewhat hostile climate.

          McCabe says that the companies will have to merge in the glare of a bright spotlight and the honeymoon period that shareholders often give merging companies may not be non-existent this time.

          Kusnetzky said middle managers may be emboldened to quietly work against the merger by questioning every detail to death. He says these people will never appear disloyal but they will be able to hold up every plan with committees, inquiries and the need for more study.

          He adds that people cannot just look at the merger as the marriage of two companies because there were the mergers Compaq has pulled off prior to this current deal.

          “When you look closely at Compaq you see three animals fighting inside of that bag,” Kusnetzky says. “It is like three cats growling and hissing at each other and they (Compaq) never quite settled that. It is clear that you have Tandem folks, DEC folks and Compaq folks. Now you add HP to the mix and it may well be four cats fighting in the bag.”

          The trial, scheduled to start Tuesday (US time), is expected to last three days.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Compaq merger

More about CompaqCompaqDeutsche BankDeutsche BankHewlett PackardHPIDC AustraliaScott CorporationSecurities and Exchange CommissionSummit StrategiesTandem

Show Comments
[]